Anyone seeking to secure true
mental health for a squirrel need only shine some sunlight on him.
Here are some questions
you should ask of any “ex-Scientologist” boasting that he “practices
Scientology outside the Church.”
-
How many copies of DMSMH has he sold in the
past week?
-
How many copies of Way to Happiness has he
distributed in the past month?
-
How many hours of auditing did he deliver last
year?
-
How many student completions has he produced?
-
Who is his Case Supervisor?
-
Where does he get crammed when he makes an
auditing goof?
-
How many people has he gotten off drugs
-
How many Volunteer Ministers has he made in the
past year?
Any comparison as to the amount of Scientology getting
done outside the church compared to inside the church is as a drop of
water against the mighty sea.
Quality counts
And what about quality? I was
present at an LRH lecture where Ron talked at length of the
impossibility of a “lone practitioner” being able to deliver standard
Scientology. Without a separately hatted auditor, course supervisor,
case supervisor, examiner, cramming officer, and registrar (to name just
a few) you can just kiss goodbye any hope of obtaining standard results
on preclears. This was later written up in policy. That is one of the
reasons almost all of the large Missions of earlier years turned into
Orgs (Churches). It was the only way to expand and maintain quality.
The Auditors Code
For over 50 years, every
Scientology Auditor has subscribed to the Auditor’s Code. The Auditor’s Code,
written by LRH, is an ethical code
undertaken by an auditor to protect the wins and successes of his
preclears, much as the Hippocratic Oath is to doctors. It includes the
edict never to invalidate a preclear’s case or gains or evaluate for a
preclear in session. And there is Auditor’s Code Clause
26
which states: “I promise to cooperate fully with the authorized
organizations of Dianetics and Scientology in safeguarding the ethical
use and practice of those subjects.”
A word about the
materials
Because it is a workable
technology, it is important that the religious materials of Scientology
are preserved and made available. Perhaps the most bizarre
criticism emanating from some squirrels concerns the Church's treatment
of those materials. When I did the Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course (at Saint Hill in 1968) there were no lecture transcripts of any
kind whatsoever. None of the early congress materials (including
the PDC) were available at all,
even on tape. The Phoenix Lectures were only available in a poorly
edited book, just released, which had hundreds of typographical errors.
There was no Technical Dictionary, no Book of Basics; the
Scientology Axioms could only be found in a soft-cover booklet
of poor quality paper which readily fell apart......Do you get the idea?
What an incredible task it was to collect up, edit, and publish the
hundreds of millions of words in LRH tapes and written materials. Not
to mention getting them translated into dozens and dozens of languages.
Any objective view could only agree that the state of Scientology
materials has improved 1,000-fold in the past 25 years.
|